Town, School Officials Divided Over IT Study

Members of the North Kingstown Town Council and School Committee listened to the findings of an IT consolidation study.

North Kingstown may be one baby step closer to consolidating some of its services following the findings of a study of the town and school department’s informational technology (IT) services.

Members of the North Kingstown Town Council and School Committee sat in a joint session Monday night to hear the findings of the $40,000 study by Elert & Associates – .  According to Elert’s Pete Gray, combining town and school IT support services could incur cost savings down the road. The study, which spanned five months and included interviews with town and school employees and an assessment of facilities, recommends that the town’s IT department take over the management of the school’s IT – excluding the management of servers, desktops, applications and desktop help desk support. According to the study’s findings, the town had a "solid" IT department while the school department’s infrastructure “is in need of some work.”

“The town has built a very robust infrastructure, so we felt that (school IT) could be ‘in-sourced’ back to the town,” said Gray. Along with North Kingstown's needs, the town's IT department also services the Town of Exeter.

The study also suggested the elimination of one position and restructuring of positions if the town and school departments did combine services. In their findings, Elert recommends that the town’s IT director, Jason Albuquerque, would handle the functions for both town and school departments. The school department does not have an IT director; instead, the network manager, Richard Booth and the assistant superintendent handle the duties of the school’s IT director.

"An organization the size of our community, I think we only need one person [to run IT]," said School Committee Member Bill Mudge, who supported the combining of town and school resources.

According to Elert, the reduction from eight staffers to seven staffers would yield about $72,000 in annual savings. Elert projects that a consolidated IT department could yield as much as $450,000 in savings over a five year period. Before that can happen, Gray says the school department’s IT infrastructure needs improving.

While town buildings’ telecommunication and equipment rooms rated favorably in Elert’s study – with the condition of four town buildings categorized “excellent” shape with two others in “fair” shape – only the 10-year-old () rated as excellent. , where the building's telecommunications room is housed in an active faculty bathroom, was rated as “unacceptable.” In total, the school department would need to do $293,000 worth of infrastructure improvements - $186,000 if they chose not to re-cable . On the town side, Elert recommends $10,500 work of improvements.

“There are a number of things our district needs to pay attention to and we prioritize a list of things we need,” said Superintendent Phil Auger. “Many of the things on this [list of suggested infrastructure improvements] don’t quite make it to the top.”

School Committee Member Melvoid Benson, however, supported the idea of spending money to save money down the road, comparing it to insulating a house and incurring energy savings later down the road.

For this consolidation to be successful, the Elert study states that all parties need to buy in to the plan. However, if the past four years have been any indication, that may be a tall order. Since the town’s consolidation committee was created four and a half years ago to study cost-saving measures, there has been no official consolidation of services between the town and school departments.

One area of contention following Elert’s presentation Monday night was the question of who would head this proposed town-wide IT department.

“It seems to me it's pretty clear in saying that the town IT director is to be taking over [for the school IT director,]” said School Committee Member Lynda Avanzato. “The savings seems to be the [elimination] of the school’s IT director.”

For Superintendent Phil Auger, the question of who would head the proposed town-wide IT department could lead to "major contention."

“Any system [for the school department] that would not have him (Booth) running the show, I’m worried about,” said Auger. “It’s not because I’m trying to protect someone who is loyal to me or is a friend:  this guy has a great job performance and is doing incredible work and has been saving us a lot of money over the years.”

Councilman Chuck Brennan suggested that the town and school departments look at “collaboration versus consolidation.”

“We both employ a lot of smart people,” said Brennan. “It shouldn’t be about fighting over who is in charge.”

Avanzato, pointing to the school department's size advantage over the town, suggested that the school's IT director serve as the town-wide director.

“We need to get away from the ‘my dog is bigger than your dog’ kind of thing,” said Town Manager Michael Embury. “Because four and a half years later, we’re still sitting here talking about the same thing.”

For Council Member Charles Stamm, who also sits on the consolidation committee, moving toward IT consolidation would be a “baby step” and stop the pattern of “kicking the can down the road.”

At Monday’s meeting, all members of the Town Council stated that they supported Elert’s recommendations. The School Committee will discuss the matter at its Jan. 17 meeting.

Wickford Light January 12, 2012 at 05:45 PM
I look forward to the poll
NKresidenttaxpayervoter January 12, 2012 at 06:56 PM
oh how we do love our studies!. perhaps we should hire some to study the study. remember, baby steps.
NKRI Transparency January 12, 2012 at 09:19 PM
As a NK taxpayer I do not want to see an increase in my taxes.....any thoughts?
Dave January 17, 2012 at 12:54 AM
Wickford Light, you might want to dig a little deeper. I'm aware that Asset Mgt recommended the PD option...that is, after they had already recommended the CD option..in writing. They changed their minds very quickly after Embury got ahold of them. As far as the ELERT report, reports tend to reflect what the primary person in charge wants them to. Go back and find the report from Asset Mgt. that was unanimous in recommending the CD building before they changed their minds. The CD building is an existing building! It has 14 inch concrete walls, and a new roof. The other issues can be dealt with FAR more easily than building a new building. The supposed "code violations" were also conveniently timed and apparently only a problem during the time the Town needed to say no to coming into the CD building.
Dave January 17, 2012 at 12:54 AM
Further, the Town Manager claimed it would cost ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS for a new generator (one of the claimed reasons for not moving to the CD building), and that it was impossible to move the generator theTown already had. None of that made sense at all, a generator can be moved fairly easily. The Manager was adamantly opposed to moving into the CD building, and he used every silly excuse in the book to avoid it. The work that's needed at the CD building is not extensive, the building is a fallout shelter! Building an entire separate facililty for half a million unbudgeted dollars is not taxpayer friendly, and undermined consolidation, obviously. It didn"t go out to bid! I don't know about you but I have a problem with breaking the law that way. Sorry for not answering the claims on the prior article, I was most likely working and never saw those comments. I need to work hard to pay the taxes in this town for the Town Council's pet projects.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »